首页> 外文OA文献 >Economic Comparison of Finishing Steers on Grass with Self-Fed By-Products to Finishing Cattle in a Conventional Feedlot
【2h】

Economic Comparison of Finishing Steers on Grass with Self-Fed By-Products to Finishing Cattle in a Conventional Feedlot

机译:自给水草育肥牛的经济比较 传统饲养场的牛副产品

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Two hundred forty one steers were finished utilizing a self-feeder on grass or a conventional feedlot facility. The 80 head finished on grass were self-fed either a soyhulls-DDGS-supplement or a corn-DDGS-supplement ration with access to grass from May 7 to harvest on August 26 while the 161 head conventional group was finished in a total confinement deep bedded system with the ration consisting of corn-modified DDGS-supplement-limestone-ground hay. Steers were weighed and individually identified by one of three source groups. April feeder cattle prices during the past 5 years (2004-08) for 700 to 750 lb steers was used to establish an individual value for each steer. Based on previous work, the decision was made to assign the heavier steers to the self-fed on grass group. The self-fed on grass group’s average purchase weight and price was 906 lb and $95.66/cwt ($865.84/hd), respectively, compared to the conventional group’s average weight and price of 824 lb and $101.48/cwt ($833.62/hd), respectively.The self-fed on grass group was harvested after 131 days on feed with an adjusted final weight of 1,330 lb and average daily gain of 3.24. Conventional group cattle were harvested after 138 days on feed with an adjusted final weight of 1,310 lb and average daily gain of 3.52. Differences in average daily gain were significant. The self-fed on grass group had 12 lb heavier carcasses, but this was not significantly different. Fat cover and yield grades were similar between the two management groups. The self-fed on grass had significantly lower marbling scores than the conventional group; resulting in 47% less Choice carcasses. Feed cost for the self-fed on grass group included feed delivered to the self-feeders, warm up feed charge and pasture charge of $50/acre or $23.13/hd. Feed cost for the conventional group included total ration delivered to the feed bunk and the warm up feed charge. Total feed cost for the self-fed on grass group was $331.82/hd compared to $359.12/hd for the conventional group. The conventional fed group had a higher average daily gain which offset the total feed cost/hd resulting in the conventional fed group having a lower feed cost/cwt of gain, $74.28/cwt compared to $78.89/cwt for the self-fed on grass group. Total cost for the self-fed on grass group was $378.78/hd compared to $430.57/hd for the conventional group resulting in total cost of gains of $89.25/cwt and $90.25/cwt, respectively. The conventional groups profit was -$32.57/head compared to - $12.02/head for the self-fed on grass group. The total cost differences were not significantly different.
机译:利用草地上的自动给料器或传统的饲养场设施完成了214个牛ers。在草上完成的80头由大豆或DDGS补充的自给自足饲料,可从5月7日开始使用草,直到8月26日收获,而在常规情况下,由161头的常规组在完全封闭的情况下完成配给量为玉米改良DDGS-补充石灰石-地面干草的分层系统。对three牛皮进行称重并由三个来源组之一进行单独鉴定。使用过去5年(2004-08年)700到750磅ste牛的4月肉牛价格来确定每个ste牛的个人价格。根据以前的工作,决定将较重的ers牛分配给自给自足的草地组。自饲草类组的平均购买重量和价格分别为906磅和$ 95.66 / cwt($ 865.84 / hd),而常规组的平均购买重量和价格分别为824 lb和$ 101.48 / cwt($ 833.62 / hd)饲喂131天后,收获自饲草组,调整后的最终体重为1,330磅,平均日增重为3.24。饲喂138天后收获常规牛群,调整后的最终体重为1,310磅,平均日增重为3.52。平均每日收益差异显着。在草丛上自给自足的car体重12磅,但这没有显着差异。两个管理组之间的脂肪覆盖率和产量等级相似。在草地上自给自足的大理石花纹得分明显低于传统组。从而使Choice屠体减少了47%。在草场上自给自足的饲料成本包括交付给自给饲料的饲料,预热饲料费用和牧场费用$ 50 /英亩或$ 23.13 / hd。常规饲料组的饲料成本包括送入饲料仓的总配给量和预热饲料费用。自饲草类组的总饲料成本为331.82美元/小时,而常规组为359.12美元/小时。常规饲喂组的平均日增重较高,这抵消了总饲料成本/日增重,导致常规饲喂组的饲喂成本/ cwt增幅较低,为74.28美元/英担,相比之下草皮自饲组为78.89美元/英担。 。草场自给自足的总成本为$ 378.78 / hd,而常规组为$ 430.57 / hd,因此获得的总成本分别为$ 89.25 / cwt和$ 90.25 / cwt。常规组的利润为-$ 32.57 /头,而草饲自给组的利润为-$ 12.02 /头。总成本差异无明显差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号